Posted on

AMD at CES 2025: RDNA 4 GPUs with FSR4, new X3D CPUs for desktops and laptops

AMD has already announced its new Ryzen Z2 chips for handheld PCs, but its CES 2025 keynote also included a whole new generation of graphics cards and new X3D processors for both desktops and laptops.

We’ll start with the graphics news, as the American firm detailed two models on the new RDNA 4 architecture – the RX 9070 XT and RX 9070 – as well as a long-awaited upgrade to their FSR upscaling tech, FSR4.

The RX 9070 XT and 9070 are positioned to counter Nvidia’s mid-tier 40-series and 50-series graphics cards, with the RDNA 4 architecture promising improved ray-tracing performance, better AI capabilities and even an improved media encoder – all areas of relative weakness for AMD versus competitors like Nvidia and Intel. The cards are produced on a 4nm process and ship this quarter, with models coming from the likes of Acer, Asus, Sapphire, XFX, ASRock, Gigabyte and PowerColor.

Here are the relevant RDNA 4 slides.

FidelityFX Super Resolution 4 is the first time AMD is using AI for its upscaling, something long embraced by Nvidia to good effect. The feature is exclusive to RDNA 4 graphics cards, and hopefully will offer a step change beyond previous AMD efforts in what is now quite a competitive space with the likes of Sony, Intel and Nvidia all producing reasonable solutions. As before, frame generation and anti-lag tech is included.

AMD is also leveraging its cards improved AI capabilities to let users generate images, summarise locally-stored documents and ask a chat-bot AMD-related questions – so I’m sure it won’t be long after the cards are released that humorous screenshots of inappropriate bot behaviour are posted.

The company’s CPU announcements are perhaps a little more straightforward. First, we got what we all expected was coming: two new desktop 9000 X3D CPUs, the 9950X3D and 9900X3D, both to come in the first half of 2025.

Model Cores/Threads Max Boost/ Base Total Cache PCIe TDP
AMD Ryzen 9950X3D 16C/32T 5.7GHz/ 4.3GHz 144MB Gen 5 170W
AMD Ryzen 9900X3D 12C/24T 5.5GHz/ 4.4GHz 140MB Gen 5 120W
And here’s the CPU side of the equation.

If you’re familiar with the 7950X3D and 7900X3D, this is familiar territory, with both being two-CCD parts but the higher number corresponding to a fully-activated part and the lower a cut-back version. That means 16 cores for the 9950X3D and 12 for the 9900X3D, with the flagship part offering a 5.7GHz max boost and 144MB of vertically-stacked v-cache. It doesn’t look the cache features on both cores, which is a bit of a disappointment.

The 9950X3D performance numbers look good too, with AMD’s figures indicating an eight percent advantage over the 7950X3D across 40 titles. There are some fairly significant gains here as well in certain games, with a 1.58x turn-out in Counter-Strike 2, 1.28x in Far Cry 6 and 1.16x in Starfield. Versus the significantly less threatening Core Ultra 9 285K, AMD’s labs found a 20 percent performance advantage on average, with 1.3x or higher results in the likes of Starfield, Cyberpunk 2077, Space Marine 2, Final Fantasy 16, Far Cry 6 and Watch Dogs: Legion.

As well as the desktop chips, AMD also announced its first X3D chip for laptops, the 9955HX3D. The top of a lineup codenamed Fire Range that also includes two non-X3D chips, the 9955HX and 9850HX, the flagship X3D chip includes 144MB of cache, a 5.4GHz max turbo and a 16-core, 32-thread design.

Model Cores / Threads Max Boost / Base Total Cache GPU cTDP
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 16/32 5.4GHz/ 2.5 GHz 144 MB AMD Radeon 610M graphics 55-75W
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX 16/32 5.4GHz/ 2.5 GHz 80 MB AMD Radeon 610M graphics 55-75W
AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX 12/24 5.2GHz/ 3.0 GHz 76 MB AMD Radeon 610M graphics 45-75W

To see this content please enable targeting cookies.

That sounds like a formula for an extremely powerful CPU that ought to outclass even laptops with full desktop chips, but we’ll have to wait until nearer launch in the first half of this year to get some performance figures, it seems.

Overall, it’s quite an impressive series of announcements from AMD, though I’m sure there will be some disappointment that the larger Ryzen 9000 X3D chips aren’t going to go on sale immediately.

Stay tuned for more news as it comes in – with Nvidia being the next to fire its keynote salvo in the early morning UK time.

Posted on

This potent PowerColor RX 7900 XT is down to just $630 from Amazon USA

AMD’s RX 7900 XT bafflingly launched at close to $800, which made it quite overpriced when it first released, and thankfully we’ve seen prices drop on this GPU to much more acceptable levels. A case in point is this current reduction from Amazon USA on this PowerColor Hellhound variant, which has seen a big $100 price cut from Amazon USA to bring it down to $630, which is a seriously solid deal.

The fact is that the 7900 XT is a powerful graphics card for 1440p and 4K gaming, whatever price it is. In our 7900 XT review, we noted its performance was comparable to Nvidia’s last-gen RTX 3080 and 3080 Ti, and sits well against the 4080. It’s actually somewhat behind the 4070 Super in RT-based workloads, but pulls ahead in the likes of Control, compared against the 4070 Super and 4070 Ti non-Super at 1440p. At Doom Eternal, we recorded an average 4K frame-rate over 200fps, while in the more demanding F1 22 we saw over 150fps. Gears 5, Control and Red Dead Redemption 2 were all comfortably over 60fps at 4K too, even with settings cranked.

As well as being a great card for 1440p and 4K gaming, the 7900 XT also comes with a solid complement of features that also make this a formidable choice for content creation workloads. There’s support for AMD’s new media engine, which brings support for AV1 encoding. Moreover, the 7900 XT also comes with support for both HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 2.1, the latter being a future-looking display standard that could give the 7900 XT better utility as new high-res, high-refresh displays are released.

This specific Hellhound model is also one of the more left-field choices compared to other options, with a grey colour scheme that’s accented by bright blue lighting on the card’s triple fan cooling setup. It’s got quite an interesting look to it, and would pair well inside a black build for some accented colour, or if you’re going for a meaner look.

At $630, the RX 7900 XT becones a much more compelling purchase, especially with Nvidia’s Super cards in mind. If you’re after an excellent GPU for 1440p and 4K gaming, then this is certainly a deal to consider.

Posted on

Beelink SER9 review: AMD’s Strix Point is its most powerful PC APU to date – but how does it game?

It’s fair to say that AMD is now leading the mobile x86 processor market, with its APUs particularly potent in powering the Steam Deck, ROG Ally and other PC handhelds. Following on from the Z1 Extreme and similar 7840U/8840U processors, there are two next-gen series: the upcoming Z2 lineup and the currently-available Strix Point AI SoCs. We’re looking at the latter today – and it’s the top-spec Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Rather than a power-constrained PC handheld or even a gaming laptop though, we’re testing a mini PC that can juice the APU up to 65W. That ought to deliver excellent gaming results, but how does the HX 370 compare to the Steam Deck at matched power levels? And how much extra do you get by ramping all the way up to 65W? We’ve put the tiny Beelink SER9 through its paces to find out.

First off, we should cover the SER9 itself. This unit is absolutely tiny, with a total volume of 0.59L – for context, even small form factor gaming PC cases tend to be around the 10L mark. The 100W power supply delivers up to 65W of power to the processor alone, while the full metal chassis is replete with ports: four USB-A and two USB-C, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a, two 3.5mm and 2.5-gig ethernet. (There’s sadly no Thunderbolt or USB 4, which would have been useful for eGPU experimentation.) The units storage can also be upgraded with two PCIe 4.0 slots on the underside of the unit. All this power in such a small space doesn’t come cheap – the solitary 32GB RAM and 1TB SSD model comes to $999 – but the machine is certainly powerful enough to justify the expense, while running cool and quiet.

Here’s the full assortment of Strix Point benchmarks with the SER9. Watch on YouTube
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (SER9) Steam Deck OLED APU
CPU 4x Zen 5 cores @ up to 5.1GHz
8x Zen 5c cores @ up to 3.3GHz
4x Zen 2 cores @ up to 3.5GHz
GPU 16 RDNA 3.5 CUs @ up to 2.9GHz 8 RDNA 2 CUs @ up to 1.6GHz
Memory 32GB LPDDR5x @ 7500MT/s 16GB LPDDR5 @ 6400MT/s
AI NPU, up to 50TOPS None
Power Up to 65W Up to 15W

As with most PCs, you can also trade off between performance and power/thermals. There are no BIOS controls to lower the TDP, annoyingly, but a customised version of the RyzenAdj tool (many thanks to Cary from The Phawx for the assist here) lets you do so via the command line. Running at 30W turns a very quiet PC into a virtually silent one, for example, and it also opens the door to our testing at set power levels, allowing for like-for-like testing against various mobile offerings.

We started with testing at 15W, where the SER9’s HX 370 can face off against the Ryzen 7 7840U (in the AyaNeo Kun), the Deck LCD and the Deck OLED. Remember that the SER9 and AyaNeo Kun are running games natively in Windows, while the Steam Decks are running the games on Linux via the Proton translation layer.

In Cyberpunk, the SER9 is the only member of the pack to really distinguish itself, with a 37 percent lead over the Steam Deck LCD and a 32 percent margin over the AyaNeo Kun. There’s more differentation in Forza Horizon 5, where the AyaNeo Kun beats the Deck LCD by 36.5 percent, and the SER9 beats the Kun by a further 28 percent. However, the octa-core 7840U shows the most stable performance, and it’s possible that the four large cores on the SER9 are being overwhelmed – or perhaps 15W simply isn’t enough power for an APU of this size.

SER9 vs AyaNeo Kun vs Deck OLED vs Deck LCD comparison in Cyberpunk 2077
SER9 vs AyaNeo Kun vs Deck OLED vs Deck LCD comparison in Forza Horizon 5
SER9 vs AyaNeo Kun vs Deck OLED vs Deck LCD comparison in A Plague Tale Requiem
SER9 vs AyaNeo Kun vs Deck OLED vs Deck LCD comparison in Marvel's Spider-Man
Here’s a selection of game benchmarks running at 15W. The HX 370 is the fastest contender – but at 15W, the advantage is perhaps more limited than you’d expect given the spec differential. | Image credit: Digital Foundry

The differences in A Plague Tale: Requiem are also interesting, with smaller margins that point to a memory bandwidth limitation – that’s one of the few specs that doesn’t see a huge lift with the HX 370. Finally, Marvel’s Spider-Man again sees a big lead for Strix Point, with a 34 to 44 point advantage versus the Steam Deck models and the AyaNeo Kun.

Of course, there’s little point in running the HX 370 at 15W if you actually want to maximise frame-rates, so let’s ramp up the power levels and see how much extra performance we can unlock. As well as 15W runs to compare against the Steam Deck, we have 25W and 30W results for parity against the ROG Ally in its unplugged/plugged power modes and then 65W for the full-fat SER9 experience.

In short, we see a relatively close grouping at the highest power levels, with 15W falling way behind. In Cyberpunk 2077, that translates into a 32 percent frame-rate improvement from 15W to 25W, 38 percent going from 15W to 30W, and 45 percent going from 15W to 65W. That brings the diminishing returns into focus – we’re more than doubling power from 30W to 65W, but only unlocking an extra five percent performance.

We see a big boost going from 15W to 25W or 30W – no wonder AMD recommends 28W for this chip in gaming laptops. There are further advantages at 65W, though the overall story is of diminishing returns.

Beyond the canned benchmarks, we also had some time to actually sit down and play some games on the SER9 in its default 65W mode. Cyberpunk 2077 played quite well, even at a 1080p output resolution, high settings and FSR 2 quality mode upscaling, with frame-rates above 30fps even through the Cherry Blossom Market that represents one of the most CPU-intensive areas of the game – and that’s with full crowds enabled, something you don’t see on consoles. We see similar results in our other streaming tests, going into 40fps territory, which suggests that FSR 3 frame generation might be a starter – and indeed, the tech works well to lift frame-rates into a 50-70fps window without deleterious levels of input lag.

The same basic setup works well in Marvel’s Spider-Man too. 1080p, high settings, XeSS 1.3 quality upscaling and FSR 3 frame generation combine for frame-rates up to 120fps, allowing you to take good advantage of a high refresh rate monitor.

Older and less demanding games run well even without frame generation. For example, Control runs happily at 720p upscaled to 1080p via TAAU at console-equivalent settings, mostly at a locked 60fps. Switching over to a native 1080p presentation, the demanding Corridor of Doom from our old benchmarking suite reveals results in the 40s, which is pretty good going for one of the most challenging areas of the game. Of course, Control is best known for its RT implementation, and this also is doable on the SER9 – 720p, TAAU up to 1080p with RT medium for ray-traced reflections and transparency reflections. With results north of 30fps, this is hugely impressive for a device of this size!

To see this content please enable targeting cookies.

That doesn’t mean that you can play literally any game though. Alan Wake 2‘s chapter two forest scenes are a huge ask for integrated graphics, and even at 1080p FSR 2 performance and lowest settings, the SER9 falls under 30fps. Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora is similar, with borderline 30fps performance at nearly lowest settings.

Ultimately though, it’s hard not to be charmed by the Beelink mini PC. It’s handily capable, the form factor is irresistible, and it’s very quiet – quite the combination.

I do have to wonder about the future of PC handhelds though. The Ryzen 7 7840U and its equivalent Z1 Extreme delivered a good – but not game-changing – bump over Steam Deck, requiring the use of a lot more power. Strix Point offers another iterative bump, even though we’re now looking at twice the amount of compute units and more frequency than the Deck. There’s still potential for a healthy bump to performance, but it can vary drastically between games – and it perhaps underlines why the likes of Valve and Microsoft are waiting for a truly generational leap in capabilities before delivering their next-gen handhelds.

Posted on

Grab a Ryzen 5 5700X and 32GB of DDR4-3200 RAM for just $145 from Newegg

If you’re after a new CPU to put into an older AM4-based system, or want to build a potent budget rig, then this bundle deal from Newegg may be for you. Currently, they are offering the potent 5700X CPU and a free 32GB kit of DDR4-3200 Corsair Vengeance RAM for $145 after a $35 discount with code BFEDZA29.

Having an 8C/16T CPU is handy if you’re going to be making use of all of them, with more intensive workloads such as both AAA gaming as well as heavy content creation workloads that can involve things such as transcoding and editing video. The 5700X also comes with a boost clock of 4.6GHz, making it especially snappy. Taking all this into account, you’ve got yourself an especially powerful and speedy processor for a great price.

With this in mind, the 5700X offers a marvellous price to performance ratio for those more intensive workloads. If you want better gaming performance than the 5700X then you’ll be spending a fair bit more on the 5700X3D, or having to build a new system on AM5. These chips are coming down in price, but you’ve then got to deal with building a new system on a new platform. What’s more, making the most of it with the latest PCIe 5.0 SSDs and DDR5 RAM is still quite expensive, even if their respective component prices are still falling.

You also get the benefit of a bundled Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 CL16 RAM kit, which is the ideal price to performance sweet spot for DDR4, while 32GB of capacity gives you oodles of headroom for gaming and even more intensive workloads. Newegg says this is worth $53 on its own, which combined with the $35 discount on offer, makes this quite the potent deal.

If you want to grab a potent combo of components for a new or existing AM4 build, this Newegg bundle may well be for you.

Posted on

Build a budget gaming PC for under £750 thanks to these Black Friday deals

We’ve already covered a RTX 4070 Super mini gaming PC for £1300 based around Black Friday discounts, but what if you want something even more affordable – something that doesn’t require paying a premium for an extra-small case, power supply and motherboard? Here, we’re going to achieve a powerful enough machine for 1080p gaming at high settings, yet spend less than £750.

The starting point for this build is the extremely affordable Ryzen 5 5600X, which has been reduced down to £99 – a great value for a six core, 12 thread Zen 3 processor with PCIe 4.0 support. It’s got ample power for entry-level gaming and general productivity, and the inclusion of the Wraith Stealth cooler in the box means we don’t have to spend any time, thought or budget on a third-party CPU cooler.

Category Product Deal Was
CPU AMD Ryzen 5 5600X (with Wraith cooler) £98.63 £113.80
GPU PowerColor Fighter RX 6750 XT £282.52 £300
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite AX V2 ATX £100.98 £144.70
RAM Corsair Vengeance 16GB DDR4-3200 CL16 £28.98 £42.28
SSD WD Black SN770 2TB £92.99 £102.99
PSU Corsair RM850e (Used – Like New, Amazon Resale) £69.05 £86.32
Case NZXT H5 Flow (2024) £69.98 £89.99
Total £743.13 £880.08

Opting for a Ryzen 5600X means building on the venerable AM4 platform, with B550 motherboards offering the best balance of features and affordability. Luckily, there are options aplenty with on-board Wi-Fi and solid I/O for around £100-£120. One great option is the Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite V2 which costs £101 from Ebuyer and comes with Wi-Fi 6, support for PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs and speedy USB-C. That means we need some DDR4 RAM, and this 16GB kit of Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 CL16 is just £26 from Amazon. That hits the sweet spot for price to performance, and gives plenty of headroom for gaming and most content creation workloads too. The WD SN770 2TB NVMe SSD for £93 from Scan provides solid capacity and excellent performance with up to 5150MB/s reads and 4900MB/s writes, respectively.

As for the case, I’m leaning towards the NZXT H5 Flow, which provides solid room to build in, a clean aesthetic and handy extras such as decent front I/O with wider cable channels to make it easier for ham-fisted fellows like me to route cables to a reasonable standard. It also comes with two 120mm fans pre-installed for convenience, too. From Amazon, it’s £70 for Black Friday. The Corsair RM850e PSU might be overkill for what’s inside, but provides a reliable, fully modular 80+ Gold unit with lots of headroom for upgrading, and for £69 from Amazon with the Amazon Resale 20 percent reduction, it’s hard to turn down.

The piece of the puzzle that’s quite difficult to decide on is with my GPU choice. I’m aiming for something in the £250-£300 range to keep this build at around £750 excluding Windows, and I’ve narrowed it down to either the £283 AMD RX 6750 XT, or £240 Intel Arc A770 16GB model. Both cards have their merits, with the Arc A770 packing in an extra 4GB of VRAM, better RT performance and support for AV1 encoding, while the RX 6750 XT performs better and benefits from better driver support. With these reductions in mind, the £336 (w/ code CHILLY5) RX 6800 also becomes a viable choice in and around that budget, which betters both of these cards.

Building this PC is probably what’s going to occupy my time over the festive period, and I’m not totally scared at all! I shall return later on with a build update to see how it all runs.

Posted on

Quick! AMD’s Ryzen 5 5600 has had a big price cut for Black Friday Week

AMD’s Ryzen 5 5600 remains an excellent value proposition for both gaming and content creation workloads, and it only seems to be getting cheaper. We’ve seen it go as low as £100 or so earlier this year, but to be able to get it for under £80 from Amazon is quite frankly ridculous. This marks out a 65 percent cut on its RRP, and is certainly the lowest price we’ve ever seen this CPU at.

For generalists looking for an affordable CPU for a new PC build with a fair bit of grunt, the 5600 makes sense for a solid option. It’s got the necessary power for a modern system and has marked itself out over the last few years as one of the best value all-round CPUs that money can buy. A big reason for this is that it’s essentially a downclocked 5600X with a 200MHz slower base and boost clock frequencies. Otherwise, it’s the same 6 core and 12 thread processor that should be more than up to the task of both general computing, as well as more intensive workloads such as gaming. It’s intriguing to note that the non-X variant on offer here makes for an especially close competitor to the more powerful -X version at a much lower cost, making it a fantastic value choice for those wanting a blend of a capable processor for a great price. Plus, you also get the benefit of a bundled Wraith Stealth cooler, which saves you a few pounds.

You’re also entering into an ecosystem where well specced parts are becoming more affordable, with feature-packed AM4 motherboards going for good prices in a range of form factors, while DDR4 RAM in good capacities is virtually dime a dozen these days. It’s also at the point where NVMe storage prices remain at a sensible level, giving you the chance to get snappy drives in bigger capacities for decent money. You also have a reasonably decent upgrade path here up to the 5700X3D later down the line, too, if you find you need more power than the 5600 can offer.

If you are in the market for an amazing value CPU and you’d like a fantastic bang for the buck option, then this remarkable reduction on the Ryzen 5 5600 from Amazon isn’t to be missed.

Posted on

Intel reportedly lost PlayStation 6 chip deal to AMD

Intel
reportedly
lost
Sony’s
PlayStation
6
chip
contract
to
Advanced
Micro
Devices
in
2022,
missing
out
on
a
potential
$30
billion
in
revenue.

This
is
according
to

Reuters
,
with
sources
claiming
that
the
deal
fell
through
after
Intel
and
Sony
failed
to
settle
on
“how
much
Intel
stood
to
take
from
each
chip
sold.”

The
sources
alleged
that
internal
projections
from
Intel
suggested
that
Sony’s
console
business
“could
have
pumped
roughly
$30
million”
into
the
firm
had
the
contract
gone
through.

Reuters
also
noted
it
could
have
financially
boosted
Intel’s
foundry
segment,
which
formally
launched
earlier
this
year.

In
response
to
the
claims,
an
Intel
spokesperson
said:
“We
strongly
disagree
with
the
characterisation
but
are
not
going
to
comment
about
any
current
or
potential
customer
conversations.
We
have
a
very
healthy
customer
pipeline
across
both
our
product
and
foundry
business,
and
we
are
squarely
focused
on
innovating
to
meet
their
needs.”


AMD
has
had
a
design
contract
with
Sony
since
2014
,
having
made
custom
chips
for
both
PlayStation
4
and
PlayStation
5.